<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Chicago Policy Review &#187; Consumers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chicagopolicyreview.org/tag/consumers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chicagopolicyreview.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/4.0.8" -->
	<itunes:summary>Chicago Policy Radio seeks to bridge the gap between academic research and policy practice. Featuring short, insightful conversations with prominent policy makers and academics, our podcasts keeps you informed of the most innovative policy ideas from academia and from the field. Chicago Policy Radio is a production of the Chicago Policy Review and the University of Chicago&#039;s Harris School of Public Policy.</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Thomas Day, David Levine, and Claire O&#039;Hanlon </itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://chicagopolicyreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Podcast-Logo-Bigger-Margin.jpg" />
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>Thomas Day, David Levine, and Claire O&#039;Hanlon </itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>media@chicagopolicyreview.org</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<managingEditor>media@chicagopolicyreview.org (Thomas Day, David Levine, and Claire O&#039;Hanlon )</managingEditor>
	<itunes:subtitle>Bridging the gap between policy wonks and political hacks.</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:keywords>Policy, Chicago, University</itunes:keywords>
	
	<itunes:category text="News &amp; Politics" />
		<rawvoice:frequency>Biweekly</rawvoice:frequency>
		<item>
		<title>Pessimistic Americans Are Bad Shoppers</title>
		<link>http://chicagopolicyreview.org/2012/03/07/pessimistic-americans-are-bad-shoppers/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=pessimistic-americans-are-bad-shoppers</link>
		<comments>http://chicagopolicyreview.org/2012/03/07/pessimistic-americans-are-bad-shoppers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 15:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frank Manzo IV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Labor & Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research in Brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Expenditures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Benson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric French]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mariacristina De Nardi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reuters/University of Michigan Survey of Consumers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagopolicyreview.org/?p=1643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Great Recession has meant $1.069 trillion less in consumer expenditures. And consumers still aren't feeling confident.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Americans are not consuming like they used to.</p>
<p>The 2008-2009 economic downturn saw the largest year-to-year drop in personal consumption in the United States since 1945. A new working paper from authors at the Chicago Federal Reserve, “<a href="http://www.chicagofed.org/digital_assets/publications/economic_perspectives/2012/1Q2012_part1_denardi_french_benson.pdf">Consumption and the Great Recession</a>,” utilizes recent economic data to illustrate this consumption decline. Authors De Nardi, French, and Benson find that the drop in consumption can be explained almost entirely by consumers’ expectations about their future income and changes in their current wealth.</p>
<p>The report offers three significant conclusions:</p>
<ol>
<li>the Great Recession saw “the most severe and persistent decline” in consumption since the Second World War;</li>
<li>patterns of consumption prior to the downturn were not atypical; and</li>
<li>the recovery has been “uncharacteristically weak&#8221; with consumption levels taking three years to return to pre-recession levels. The second-longest rebound, which occurred after the 1974 recession, took just one year.</li>
</ol>
<p>Consumption dropped 3.4% from the highest to the lowest point in the Great Recession. In all previous recessions, the study notes, consumption “fell only modestly or increased.” Consumption levels have been slower to recover, as well, growing 4.1% in total over the last 5 years. This compares unfavorably to economic performance since 1971, which shows that consumption growth averaged 15% every five years. Thus, consumer spending is 11% below the long-run average.</p>
<p>The authors’ microeconomic findings also illustrate weak consumer confidence.</p>
<p>Expected income growth by consumers &#8212; measured by how much respondents to the <a href="http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/financial/financial_products/a-z/umichigan_surveys_of_consumers/#tab3">Reuters/University of Michigan Survey of Consumers</a> expect their incomes to increase or decrease in the next two months &#8212; has declined significantly and is lower than pre-recession levels. During the current recovery, expected nominal income growth was actually negative for the first time ever.</p>
<p>This pessimism transcends age group, education level, and income level, though those in the top 20% of the wealth distribution have decreased spending the most (-5.4%), reflecting proportionately larger decreases in house and stock market values. This bleak outlook suggests that the economy “will experience low income and consumption growth over the next two years.”</p>
<p>Overall, the study concludes that consumption expenditures are $1.069 trillion (10%) less than they would have been if not for the Great Recession.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chicagopolicyreview.org/2012/03/07/pessimistic-americans-are-bad-shoppers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
